From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 18 02:26:22 1997
Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA25989
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 02:26:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA21048; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:16:08 +0100
Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA00705; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:24:45 +0100
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Safe elisp functions?
References: <199702172311.PAA23394@newman> 	<m2zpx356pc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199702172345.PAA23641@newman> <m2wws755ux.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Organization: The Church of Emacs
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Date: 18 Feb 1997 09:24:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 17 Feb 1997 16:13:10 -0800
Message-ID: <rjeneemshe.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/Emacs 19.34
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> We have so many abort()s sprinkled
> around the code that I don't trust any of it.

Is there any security concerns with abort?  I'd have thought that was
one of the most trustworthy functions in the C library.

