From xemacs-m  Wed Feb 12 04:42:26 1997
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de (mgate.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA28425
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 04:42:25 -0600 (CST)
Received: from helios (actually helios.tnt.uni-hannover.de) by mgate 
          with SMTP (PP); Wed, 12 Feb 1997 11:42:09 +0100
Received: from daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de by helios (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) 
          id LAA20963; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 11:41:51 +0100
Received: by daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA14539;
          Wed, 12 Feb 1997 11:41:45 +0100
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 11:41:45 +0100
Message-Id: <199702121041.LAA14539@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de>
From: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
To: jmiller@bay1.bayserve.net
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: compressed .el files
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.95.970212011204.27642D-100000@bay1.bayserve.net>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.95.970212011204.27642D-100000@bay1.bayserve.net>
X-Face: n}R'l6CHRf>pi&bj7[x0CW3:kmXm@1)7m+l*9[fp;-Ow4Xe~=5E;skf?2> 
        y]f{HzB|Q(\V9+y$PP~.4G[2n4W7{6Ilm[AMY9B:0kj.K_$-d%p4YIF*bX;=ADp6{ 
        HS@NEv9c.VII+9PgXHASx}K(jy^t=q%qzZ72q1e4E;O!$A$`&wgtLk"1%p.nC_G!] 
        4d1!+J4Q#YD_iXeEy`1x)d\r$1Qn\'23n|[8Y_xzuXJJ7W(EGqnzB]`]aq??;+z=) 
        DW~\'Vq&F'g%QU[Mv2:}nS>SdZFTEC2GsgB=Q,:~H<R5S[:ZN%B:s0;|v1x"Jb
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.90)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Miller <jmiller@bay1.bayserve.net> writes:

    Jeff> Steve,

    Jeff>  about a month ago, I sent in a patch to compress the .el
    Jeff> files during a "make install".  Is there any merit in it?  I
    Jeff> keep bumping into about 90% full here at home, so I
    Jeff> definitely like it. :) Just wondering whether I should keep
    Jeff> pursuing it.

This should be an optional feature, because it slows down the loading
of packages.

