From xemacs-m  Thu Dec 12 04:11:34 1996
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id EAA02865 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:11:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id LAA26453; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 11:10:41 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
Cc: Joel Peterson <tarzan@aosi.com>, XEmacs Beta Test <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: XEmacs redisplay optimization work and unrelated buffer stuff (2nd try)
References: <199612041913.NAA29309@xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu> 	<32A78BF5.18300EE4@aosi.com> <199612060857.AAA03840@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 12 Dec 1996 11:10:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of Fri, 6 Dec 1996 00:57:45 -0800
Message-ID: <kigwwuo13a7.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/XEmacs 19.14

Martin Buchholz (mrb@eng.sun.com) wrote:
> As Chuck has pointed out, we can never expect performance of XEmacs to
> equal performance of GNU Emacs, since there is a price to be paid for
> the display features.

Do not forget that the GNU people will definitely want to add those
features to GNU Emacs one day.  Then they will have to pay the same
price.

> The price for Mule support is pretty heavy too - on the order of 30%.

But this is seen only if XEmacs is configured with --with-mule.  Or
not?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Hocemo 101-icu!
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Psychos _do not_ explode when sunlight hits them."

