From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 11 00:31:45 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA18489
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:31:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA10950;
	Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:43:19 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [return] under dired
References: <199702101746.MAA14377@cs.sunysb.edu>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: kifer@CS.SunySB.EDU's message of Mon, 10 Feb 1997 12:35:30 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.103)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 10 Feb 1997 22:43:18 -0800
Message-ID: <m2g1z3c06x.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/XEmacs 20.1

Michael Kifer writes:

> I just noticed that [return] under dired in 19.1[45] and 20.0 are bound to
> newline, while in FSF it is bound to dired-advertised-find-file.

> Is there a reason for this discrepancy? Seems to me that visiting a file in
> response to hitting return is a more reasonable thing to expect than
> getting "buffer read-only" error.

O.K.  Corrected in the next betas.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

