From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 10 09:54:38 1997
Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [38.225.141.10])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA10902
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 09:54:37 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA32270 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 07:52:46 -0800
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 07:52:46 -0800
Message-Id: <199702101552.HAA32270@newman>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: How robust is the mule font code?
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Would I break anything if I explicitly set the encoding of fonts to
iso8859-1 instead of '*' from within the font package?  It is picking up
hp-roman8 encodings on some systems, which is just wrong.  I don't want to
screw up the multilingual stuff in W3 though.

-Bill P.

