From xemacs-m  Sat Feb  8 19:30:35 1997
Received: from martigny.ai.mit.edu (martigny.ai.mit.edu [18.43.0.152])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA14411
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 19:30:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: by martigny.ai.mit.edu
	(1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA201311825; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:30:25 -0500
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:30:25 -0500
Message-Id: <199702090130.AA201311825@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
From: Bill Dubuque <wgd@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
To: steve@miranova.com
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
In-Reply-To: <m27mkiu8ku.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> (message from Steven L Baur on
	08 Feb 1997 16:28:01 -0800)
Subject: Re: wot i need

Steve: are you saying that you also see no difference in times
between both your test AND Kyle's simpler test?

I tried Kyle's test in 19.11 and 19.12b25 and 19.11 is about the
same speed as FSF 19.28, but 19.12b25 is about twice as slow.
But, I don't remember if the latter is compiled with debugging
or not.

-Bill

