From xemacs-m  Sat Feb  8 17:50:51 1997
Received: from martigny.ai.mit.edu (martigny.ai.mit.edu [18.43.0.152])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA10734
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 17:50:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: from berne.ai.mit.edu by martigny.ai.mit.edu with SMTP
	(1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA191485848; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 18:50:48 -0500
From: Bill Dubuque <wgd@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199702082350.AA191485848@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Received: by berne.ai.mit.edu
	(1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA011195847; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 18:50:47 -0500
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 18:50:47 -0500
To: kyle_jones@wonderworks.com
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
In-Reply-To: <QQccbm18217.199702082339@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> (message from
	Kyle Jones on Sat, 8 Feb 1997 18:39:25 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: wot i need

: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 18:39:25 -0500 (EST)
: From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
: 
: Steven L. Baur writes:
: > 
: > ... I timed XEmacs *faster* than Emacs running this code.
: 
: Not me.  41 vs. 62 seconds.

Hmm, if opposite results obtain on different platforms then that
would seem to imply the problem is either platform or build 
dependent.  Can anyone else reproduce Steven or Kyle's claim?
If so, then the platforms and build options should be contrasted.

-Bill Dubuque

