From xemacs-m  Fri Feb  7 10:53:48 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA08200
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 10:53:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id RAA14769; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 17:53:35 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.0 --with-mule segfaults when viewing Japanese
References: <yviasp3digdf.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com> 	<199702041227.NAA17114@sen2.ida.liu.se> 	<kig6808gqbw.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 	<199702070342.TAA14213@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 	<199702071422.PAA29298@sen2.ida.liu.se> 	<kighgjo4nav.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <199702071636.RAA29564@sen2.ida.liu.se>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 07 Feb 1997 17:53:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: David Byers's message of Fri, 7 Feb 1997 17:36:50 +0100
Message-ID: <kig68044kxd.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/XEmacs 19.14

David Byers <davby@ida.liu.se> writes:

> The first needs bounds checking. The second *could* to without since
> it is called only if the first lookup finds an entry in the display
> table (which implies that the character is within the bounds of the
> display table) but the miniscule performance gain to me isn't worth
> the loss of clarity resulting from the use of two nearly identical
> but subtly different macros. Others may disagree.

Now I see -- your fix was valid anyway you look at it, as the macro
was called from a small number of places.  Sorry for the initial
misunderstanding.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Good pings come in small packets.

