From xemacs-m  Fri Feb  7 02:05:20 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA29556
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 02:05:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA22265;
	Fri, 7 Feb 1997 00:16:24 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Linux, 20.0 and doc strings
References: <32FADF1A.7D596084@po.iijnet.or.jp>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Jareth Hein's message of Fri, 07 Feb 1997 16:51:54 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 07 Feb 1997 00:16:24 -0800
Message-ID: <m2d8ud2fqf.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/XEmacs 20.0

Jareth Hein writes:

> Am I the only one who consistantly loses DOC strings on linux builds?
> The same version (with my patches) compiles fine on Irix 6.2 & HP-UX
> 10.20 but looses a large percentage of DOC strings under linux 2.0.28 w/
> libc-5-4-17 (reported in an earlier message)

That's the kernel revision and libc revision I am using.  The DOC file
is built fine for me.

> This also leads to the help garbage that someone else reported
> yesterday (out of range errors).

> Clues, anyone?

Have you tried building without CDE?  Where did you get CDE for Linux
anyway?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

