From xemacs-m  Wed Feb  5 09:41:20 1997
Received: from cs.uchicago.edu (alexandria.cs.uchicago.edu [128.135.11.87])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29164
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:41:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gargoyle164.cs.uchicago.edu (gargoyle20 [128.135.20.100]) by cs.uchicago.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA07513 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:41:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from csdayton@localhost) by gargoyle164.cs.uchicago.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id JAA17126; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:41:18 -0600 (CST)
Sender: csdayton@cs.uchicago.edu
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.0 w/ MULE enables TM
References: <199702042330.PAA28471@roy> 	<m2raiwf4qu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199702050122.RAA29856@roy>
X-Face: `X="Sg7A[PL3/_8;>>ggjOy&\KtWiH7.wQ>Y"hQ2fxSG9RkPTCT}&^()5[Gp(-DaTf:t`MSBt@Li_C9U@y#i/c?i$uLQ8[';I$mMAm_rZta>l`STW_aA5`iD[!80p#_qmN4#tMu[Pu7wkIi)5*4YXAhg)9R2-BAWPbVOzgE$Ib4QuZn0YaE~'C/7h^CTuPybz$u
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Soren Dayton <csdayton@cs.uchicago.edu>
Date: 05 Feb 1997 09:41:17 -0600
In-Reply-To: Damon Lipparelli's message of Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:22:02 -0800
Message-ID: <xcdvi87gt0i.fsf@gargoyle164.cs.uchicago.edu>
Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.9/XEmacs 20.0

Damon Lipparelli <lipp@primus.com> writes:

> >>>>> Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:
> 
>     > Damon Lipparelli writes:
>     >> I just re-built XEmacs 20.0 (test1) with MULE enabled (fantastic, by
>     >> the way) and was surprised to discover that TM (or a large part of
>     >> it) is dumped into XEmacs.  In particular, 'mime-setup is a feature
>     >> and this really screws up sending with VM 6.
> 
>     > It is a feature only when you have SunPro enabled.  Otherwise it is
>     > not dumped.
> 
> Um...why?
 
Yeah.  Why?  We have some people here that hate MIME, but want to use
the sunpro stuff.   Is there a good reason to have them together like
this?

Soren


