From xemacs-m  Sat Feb  1 12:16:06 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07873
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 12:16:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA19894 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:19:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id NAA12204 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:13:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA22910; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:15:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199702011815.NAA22910@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Undo! 
In-reply-to: pez's message of Sat, 01 Feb 1997 00:02:25 -0500.
	     <199702010502.AAA03861@localhost.interport.net> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 13:15:53 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>


pez@dwwc.com said:
> I thought it would be a little much to have "Undoing..." then
> "Undoing... done" even though this is more of a "standard." (Although
> I wouldn't be opposed to that change if there is a consensus) 

I would much prefer to have it say "Undoing...done", provided there was a 
way to shut it up, so those of us who prefer a more taciturn editor would 
be satisfied.

--vin

