From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 28 15:15:17 1997
Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id PAA27174 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:15:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from suomi by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA04046; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:15:08 -0700
Received: by suomi (SMI-8.6) id OAA13424; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:15:08 -0700
Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>] Odd paging after making invisible text visible
References: <vku3o18u15.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> <m2enf51r9k.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado
X-Attribution: mb
From: Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov>
Date: 28 Jan 1997 14:15:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 28 Jan 1997 12:25:27 -0800
Message-ID: <vkwwsxfqn9.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov>
Lines: 42
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.6/XEmacs 19.15

>> On 28 Jan 1997 12:25:27 -0800,
>> Steven L Baur(sb) wrote:
sb> Mark Borges writes:
>> This one is still with us (I see it in 20.0-b92), and it appears to
>> make the cursor disappear, too.

sb> This I don't see.  Is the cursor really disappearing, or is it just
sb> not being colored in?  I think I've identified cases of the latter.

Sorry. Disappearing was a bad word choice. 

The real problem is that the buffer does not scroll when the cursor
goes into the (formerly) invisible text. So, if I go to the end of the
article buffer (which doesn't scroll) and start going backward using
\C-p the cursor eventually comes back.

Note that the text is visible and the buffer does scroll if I use the
(lucid) scrollbar to scroll down. (I knew there was a reason I've left
the scrollbars enabled ;-).

This was tested using Gnus-5.4.6 and XEmacs-19.15-b90.

>> On 28 Jan 1997 12:37:44 -0800,
>> David Moore(DM) wrote:

>> Find a long article.  (It has to be more than two screens long.)  `t'
>> to unhide the hidden headers.  If you now `C-x b' over to the article
>> buffer and `C-v' & `M-v', you should see some odd action.  It's as if
>> the previously invisible headers are still being considered
>> invisible.  Doing anything at all of any substance, like 
>> `M-: (point) RET' will clear things up.  (It doesn't matter what one
>> evals.) 

DM> This is a well known xemacs problem, for which there is no fix
DM> yet, I think.  Maybe I'll move it back to the top of my list of
DM> really irritating bugs.

I guess I'm out of the loop of well known problems. It sure would be
nice if it could be fixed.

-- 
  -mb-

