From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 28 03:22:19 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id DAA22731 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 03:22:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcakr23178; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 04:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 04:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcakr23178.199701280922@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [19.15b90]: Rogue dialog box
In-Reply-To: <rvsp3mrz4s.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
References: <9701280805.AA29140@mail.esrin.esa.it>
	<rvsp3mrz4s.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>

David Moore writes:
 > Simon Marshall <Simon.Marshall@esrin.esa.it> writes:
 > 
 > > Even if it really is a problem outside XEmacs, I think C-g should cancel a
 > > dialog box.  Then lusers wouldn't have to resort to killing the process.
 > 
 > 	What ever happened to the suggestion about providing a way to
 > disable dialog boxes in general?

See should-use-dialog-box, a variable.

