From xemacs-m  Mon Jan 27 19:19:05 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id TAA20984 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 19:19:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcajl15749; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 20:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 20:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcajl15749.199701280119@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: 20.0 charset names

Did we lose some charset names while I wasn't looking?  I could
have sworn iso-2022-jp was a charset once, but not in b92.
Similarly, I thought iso-8859-1 was a charset also, but I don't
see it in the return value of (charset-list) and (charsetp
'iso-8859-1) returns nil.  Seems like there were a lot more names
than I'm seeing now.

This is the list now.

(ethiopic hebrew-iso8859-8 cyrillic-iso8859-5 latin-iso8859-2 ascii chinese-cns11643-7 chinese-cns11643-4 composite chinese-cns11643-1 chinese-gb2312 japanese-jisx0208-1978 thai-tis620 arabic-2 vietnamese-upper greek-iso8859-7 latin-iso8859-4 latin-iso8859-1 vietnamese-lower chinese-cns11643-6 chinese-cns11643-3 korean-ksc5601 chinese-big5-2 japanese-jisx0212 latin-jisx0201 arabic-1 latin-iso8859-9 arabic-iso8859-6 latin-iso8859-3 control-1 sisheng chinese-cns11643-5 ipa chinese-cns11643-2 chinese-big5-1 japanese-jisx0208 katakana-jisx0201 arabic-0)

Can I depend on these names not changing?  VM has a MIME charset
name to Mule charset translation alist and it's all wrong now.
(Just so you know, I'm not upset, just seeking information.)

