From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 22 08:47:15 1997
Received: from neal.ctd.comsat.com (exim@neal.ctd.comsat.com [134.133.40.21])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id IAA06195 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 08:47:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from neal by neal.ctd.comsat.com with local (Exim 1.58 #2)
	id 0vn3xF-00014L-00; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 09:47:09 -0500
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.0 release schedule
References: <m2k9p7jo6f.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Date: 22 Jan 1997 09:47:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 21 Jan 1997 02:52:08 -0800
Message-ID: <u94tg922e0.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

    sb> The 20.0 release is going to be this weekend.

Really?  Am I the only one who finds 20.0 to be much less stable than
19.4?  19.4 has been extremely reliable - the best xemacs ever.  I
stopped using 20.0 for daily work because of various problems and
crashes.

