From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 21 22:32:39 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id WAA03096 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 22:32:38 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQbznu00979; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 23:32:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 23:32:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQbznu00979.199701220432@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 19.15b90: timezone-make-date-sortable fails
In-Reply-To: <m2sp3u9xjc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <QQbzme05252.199701211809@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2sp3u9xjc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>

Steven L. Baur writes:
 > Kyle Jones writes:
 > 
 > > (require 'timezone)
 > > (timezone-make-date-sortable "Sat, 6 Nov 4 22:18:12 MET")
 > 
 > > fails with 
 > 
 > > Args out of range: "4", -2, nil
 > 
 > Shame on somebody, this is a Y2K bug. :-P

Fitting, since the machine that generated this date header is
probably already having major problems.  Two digit years are bad
enough, but a one digit year?  Yeesh.

 > How about this hack?

It worked.  Thanks.

