From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 21 10:25:21 1997
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de (mgate.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.3])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id KAA29064 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:25:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from helios (actually helios.tnt.uni-hannover.de) by mgate 
          with SMTP (PP); Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:11:58 +0100
Received: from daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de by helios (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) 
          id RAA10680; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:10:18 +0100
Received: by daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA27001;
          Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:10:16 +0100
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:10:16 +0100
Message-Id: <199701211610.RAA27001@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de>
From: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
To: toy@rtp.ericsson.se
Cc: kyle_jones@wonderworks.com, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Buggy keybinding of ] in emacs-lisp-mode
In-Reply-To: <17495.853861850@rtp.ericsson.se>
References: <199701211416.PAA26980@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de> <QQbzlt02772.199701211516@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <17495.853861850@rtp.ericsson.se>
X-Face: n}R'l6CHRf>pi&bj7[x0CW3:kmXm@1)7m+l*9[fp;-Ow4Xe~=5E;skf?2> 
        y]f{HzB|Q(\V9+y$PP~.4G[2n4W7{6Ilm[AMY9B:0kj.K_$-d%p4YIF*bX;=ADp6{ 
        HS@NEv9c.VII+9PgXHASx}K(jy^t=q%qzZ72q1e4E;O!$A$`&wgtLk"1%p.nC_G!] 
        4d1!+J4Q#YD_iXeEy`1x)d\r$1Qn\'23n|[8Y_xzuXJJ7W(EGqnzB]`]aq??;+z=) 
        DW~\'Vq&F'g%QU[Mv2:}nS>SdZFTEC2GsgB=Q,:~H<R5S[:ZN%B:s0;|v1x"Jb
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.90)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "Raymond" == Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:

>>>>> "Kyle" == Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
    Kyle> Heiko Muenkel writes:
    >>> I've just found out, that in 19.15 Beta 90 the key ] is bound
    >>> to close-all-lisp.

    Kyle> In what mode?  I don't see that here in Lisp or Emacs-Lisp
    Kyle> mode.

    Raymond> Perhaps he's talking about ilisp mode, which does bind ]
    Raymond> to close-all-lisp.

    Raymond> I don't like that binding either, but, then, I don't
    Raymond> think I've ever typed that character into a lisp buffer
    Raymond> (not including emacs-lisp, which uses a different mode).

    Raymond> Ray

As I've written already in my last mail, I've found out, that this
stupid keybinding is only in one running XEmacs.

I remember, that I've made some experiments with the ilisp mode in
this XEmacs and may be that's the reason, why I've now this stupid
keybinding also in the emacs lisp modes.

