From xemacs-m  Thu Jan 16 03:19:39 1997
Received: from macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (macon2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.13.2])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id DAA26966 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 03:19:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from modas.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De by macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA31126; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 10:19:36 +0100
Received: by modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA23582; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 10:19:35 +0100
Sender: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: dired diffs between XEmacs and notXEmacs
References: <199701152214.PAA08959@branagh.lanl.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.95)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 16 Jan 1997 10:19:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: John Turner's message of Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:14:08 -0700
Message-Id: <y9liv4ynfix.fsf@modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.76/XEmacs 20.0

>>>>> "John" == John Turner <turner@xdiv.lanl.gov> writes:

John> [ ...]

John> o What happened?  Why did these bindings diverge?  Why is Tree Dired
John>   not in notXEmacs?  OK, never mind that last one.  It's probably a
John>   long and bloody story.

The keybindings were changed for the EFS dired.  RMS subsequently
changed the FSF Emacs dired keybindings to match them.

John> o More importantly, should XEmacs change to synchronize?  Either
John>   answer has a downside.  One annoys current XEmacs users, the other
John>   annoys new users and those that go back and forth.

That will happen with the integration of EFS.  If it's going to
happen, futzing around with the dired currently in XEmacs is not very
useful.

Cheers =8-} Mike

