From xemacs-m  Mon Jan 13 16:42:31 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id QAA07919 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 16:42:31 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id RAA26009 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:45:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id RAA08194 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:39:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id RAA15331; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:42:11 -0500
Message-Id: <199701132242.RAA15331@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta (patched 1/7/97)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Build report: 20.0-b90 Solaris 2.5 success 
In-reply-to: mrb's message of Mon, 13 Jan 1997 14:01:20 -0800.
	     <199701132201.OAA20458@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:42:10 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

Dunno.  I've consistently had this problem with process.c and glyphs.c, and 
this time also with alloc.c.  Perhaps it's swap/vm/machine cfg specific.  
It's not a big deal, but we should probably add it to the release notes.

--vin

> >>>>> "Nick" == Nick J Crabtree <nickc@scopic.com> writes:
> 
> Nick> glyphs.c and process.c refused to be optimised at -xO4 (they needed to
> Nick> be dropped to -xO3), otherwise built, installed and comes up OK.
> 
> I build XEmacs on Solaris 2.5/2.4 with Sun cc at -xO4, and everything
> seems to work fine.  This is using the new Sun Developer Products
> release that FCS'ed mere days ago.  Is it possible that this latest
> release has actually fixed this problem?  Maybe y'all want to upgrade?
> 
> Martin
> 


