From xemacs-m  Thu Sep 25 04:24:31 1997
Received: from senja.chembio.ntnu.no (senja.chembio.ntnu.no [129.241.12.15])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA16898
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 04:24:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 23402 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1997 09:24:13 -0000
Received: from similan.chembio.ntnu.no (129.241.12.8)
  by senja.chembio.ntnu.no with SMTP; 25 Sep 1997 09:24:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 5431 invoked by uid 20122); 25 Sep 1997 09:24:31 -0000
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: XEmacs memory usage
From: Morten Skjelland <Morten.Skjelland@chembio.ntnu.no>
Date: 25 Sep 1997 11:24:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: Maurizio Vitale's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:48:06 +0200"
Message-ID: <kh1k9g5wxtc.fsf_-_@chembio.ntnu.no>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.10/XEmacs 20.3(beta23) - "Sarajevo"

Hi

 Fresh xemacs 20.3b23, Quassia Gnus 0.10.

 I read a few big mail messages (~5MB), then exited gnus.

 My xemacs still uses 51M/39M RAM (SIZE/RES).

 Isn't gnumalloc able to "deallocate" memory?

Morten
-- 
I'm heading for the trees over there.
If that's not our destination,
I don't care.

