From xemacs-m  Mon Sep 22 11:05:21 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03980
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 11:04:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.7/8.8.6) id SAA27833;
	Mon, 22 Sep 1997 18:03:39 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnuserv update
References: <kig90wsdh6h.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <byd8m1ttw7.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch> <kigyb4pzfcz.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <byafh5tkqd.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 22 Sep 1997 18:03:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of "22 Sep 1997 17:46:18 +0200"
Message-ID: <kiglo0pgwtg.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.8/XEmacs 20.3(beta23) - "Sarajevo"

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> 
> > Uhm.  It seemed an unnecessary complication at the time.  Is that
> > feature really necessary?  I mean, can't one just add it to a hook,
> > which there are plenty of?
> 
> Not I that I can see. Unless you want to be messing with
> buffer-modified which I don't like at all.

No, I mean setting `gnuserv-done-function' to something that takes
care of the tmp files.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

