From xemacs-m  Mon Sep 15 15:46:08 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:46:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.7/8.8.6) id WAA06690;
	Mon, 15 Sep 1997 22:44:59 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [failure] Cyrillic on 20.3-b20 "Tirana"
References: <341D5CB5.27096ABC@humanoid.net> 	<kigraaqcrgp.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <199709152041.NAA02490@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 15 Sep 1997 22:44:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of "Mon, 15 Sep 1997 13:41:48 -0700"
Message-ID: <kigd8macnna.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 20.3(beta20) - "Tirana"

Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:

> Hrv> BTW: I see that the FSF version of ccl.c is quite diverged from our
> Hrv> mule-ccl.c.  Maybe they should be merged?
> 
> Yes.  I have not done any work myself on CCL, so our version of ccl is 
> relatively unmaintained.  It is quite possible that Emacs 20's CCL
> implementation is a better starting point than our own.  I believe Ben 
> basically stopped work on CCL once he first had signs of life.  CCL was 
> not necessary to get Japanese support working, and that was the
> funding source.

Yup.  The point I was trying to make is that CCL is a relatively small
file.  It may even be quite easy to merge, so I think someone should
go for it.  I'd try, but I don't even compile `--with-mule'.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

