From xemacs-m  Thu Sep  4 10:46:47 1997
Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05334
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 10:46:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM by relay5.UU.NET with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	id QQdfoh14220; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQdfoh29187; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:46:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:46:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQdfoh29187.199709041546@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  Re: Kyiv package failure under sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
In-Reply-To: <ocrg1rlgnmm.fsf@ml.com>
References: <ocrbu2al4j1.fsf@ml.com>
	<m2bu2a5cpc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<ocr7mcykqza.fsf@ml.com>
	<m24t81vqut.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<ocrg1rlgnmm.fsf@ml.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 XEmacs Lucid (beta90)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Colin Rafferty writes:
 > SL Baur writes:
 > > Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com> writes:
 > >> SL Baur writes:
 > 
 > >> As far a what to do in Tirana XEmacs, I would say that auto-autoloads
 > >> should be loaded from the entire package-path, just in case there is a
 > >> new package globally, but no one re-dumped XEmacs.
 > 
 > > That must be done carefully.  There are too many complaints about
 > > XEmacs slow startup speed to do this without thinking things through.
 > 
 > Why are people starting XEmacs so often that they complain about startup
 > speed?

They are complaining because FSF Emacs starts up faster.

