From xemacs-m  Thu Aug 28 10:13:53 1997
Received: from wfdutilgw.ml.com (wfdutilf01.ml.com [206.3.74.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA08793
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 10:13:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130])
	by wfdutilgw.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLgw-3.03) with ESMTP id LAA29543
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:15:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from commpost.ml.com (commpost.ml.com [146.125.4.24])
	by ml1.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLml4-2.07) with SMTP id LAA29553
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA28425 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:18:31 -0400
Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id LAA06874; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:13:20 -0400
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: [??] completer.el
X-Face: D>:hrrB{l6#\wU;)0R:OHSTA@ayd.Oq?s@Rrc;[+z0m+<-U"$G-J6L)F2QY`qK~uPu!s1(6{\#uy!Ag/D)?'L[}xErXvxoPn8T_hKi{M]/(`BF{e}X7;hby`p\.E$rJ}Aff#BT,rdDIw\y
X-Y-Zippy: Yow!  Are we laid back yet?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
Date: 28 Aug 1997 11:13:20 -0400
Message-ID: <ocr4t8apchb.fsf@ml.com>
Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 20.3(beta18) - "Bratislava"

In Bratislava (and probably before that), in lisp/ilisp, there are three 
versions of completer: completer.el, completer.new.el, and completer.no-fun.el.

The first is what we use, and the other two are identical to each
other.  Does anyone know what this is about?  I use completer regularly, 
and suffer no problems.

-- 
This posting adheres to the SELF-DISCIPLINE guidelines for better
USENET discussions. See http://www.eiffel.com/discipline.

