From xemacs-m  Mon Aug 11 12:10:55 1997
Received: from wfdutilgw.ml.com (wfdutilf01.ml.com [206.3.74.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA23125
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 12:10:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130])
	by wfdutilgw.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLgw-3.03) with ESMTP id NAA20842
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from commpost.ml.com (commpost.ml.com [146.125.4.24])
	by ml1.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLml4-2.07) with SMTP id NAA16288
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA04767 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:15:22 -0400
Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id NAA07459; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:10:25 -0400
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: strokes.el --- `package-path'
References: <199708100056.UAA23360@w20-575-57.MIT.EDU> <877mduv37h.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <m2u3gy8jlj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <bci7mdszp6f.fsf@corp.Sun.COM>
X-Face: D>:hrrB{l6#\wU;)0R:OHSTA@ayd.Oq?s@Rrc;[+z0m+<-U"$G-J6L)F2QY`qK~uPu!s1(6{\#uy!Ag/D)?'L[}xErXvxoPn8T_hKi{M]/(`BF{e}X7;hby`p\.E$rJ}Aff#BT,rdDIw\y
X-Y-Zippy: There's enough money here to buy 5000 cans of Noodle-Roni!
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
Date: 11 Aug 1997 13:10:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: Gary.Foster@Corp.Sun.COM's message of "11 Aug 1997 08:59:04 -0700"
Message-ID: <ocrbu343atb.fsf@ml.com>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/XEmacs 20.3(beta17) - "Bucharest"

Gary D Foster writes:

>>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:
sb> I would like all package distributions to be digitally signed,
sb> preferably with PGP.  I'm open to suggestions on how to build
sb> up an XEmacs web of trust.

> Well, one very obvious recommendation (at least to me anyways) is to
> have a "key signing party".  Or, if we don't have an official
> function, we could always make a point to go sign and be signed by the 
> people we have face-to-face access to.

All you Bay Area people have all the fun.

Anyone but me live in NYC?

I'm up for an XEmacs get-together/key-signing party at DBA 41.

-- 
Colin

