From xemacs-m  Mon Aug 11 11:04:27 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA22821
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:04:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Corp.Sun.COM ([129.145.35.78]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id JAA06910 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 09:03:57 -0700
Received: from legba.Corp.Sun.COM by Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id JAA09923; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 09:03:53 -0700
Received: by legba.Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id IAA18052; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 08:59:04 -0700
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: strokes.el --- `package-path'
References: <199708100056.UAA23360@w20-575-57.MIT.EDU> <877mduv37h.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <m2u3gy8jlj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: GDF
Mail-Copies-To: never
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gary.Foster@Corp.Sun.COM (Gary D. Foster)
Date: 11 Aug 1997 08:59:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: SL Baur's message of "10 Aug 1997 02:37:12 -0700"
Message-ID: <bci7mdszp6f.fsf@corp.Sun.COM>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/XEmacs 20.3(beta16) - "Budapest"

>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

    sb> I would like all package distributions to be digitally signed,
    sb> preferably with PGP.  I'm open to suggestions on how to build
    sb> up an XEmacs web of trust.

Well, one very obvious recommendation (at least to me anyways) is to
have a "key signing party".  Or, if we don't have an official
function, we could always make a point to go sign and be signed by the 
people we have face-to-face access to.

In the words of the Nike people... "Just do it".

-- Gary F.

