From xemacs-m  Tue Aug  5 08:35:28 1997
Received: from firewall1.Lehman.COM (firewall.Lehman.COM [192.147.65.66])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA13075;
	Tue, 5 Aug 1997 08:35:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from relay.messaging-svcs2.lehman.com by firewall1.Lehman.COM (8.8.6/8.6.12) id JAA03059; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cfdevx1.lehman.com by relay.messaging-svcs2.lehman.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA18977; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:34:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by cfdevx1.lehman.com (4.1/Lehman Bros. V1.6)
	id AA03090; Tue, 5 Aug 97 09:34:33 EDT
Message-Id: <9708051334.AA03090@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply-To: Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com>
X-Face: #<@""pDMxa>Mr$Wp[^l7e1RwB6]&7pRp,f=|)6y5?t45X$y(xx.x^?k~;-d>s:SL86Qt82U
 'M!RC3LrDvD/LjiYdGO!:\/\qx?YabgGC9%xw5%0-W05LRvyu9vB9TYk%5PN|C*0WgrXD-L0'g3j;h
X-Windows: The first fully modular software disaster.
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
From: Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com>
To: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
Cc: steve@xemacs.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, xemacs-webmaint@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.3-beta16 "Budapest" is released 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Aug 1997 16:30:36 +0200."
             <199708041430.QAA28916@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Aug__5_09:34:09_1997-1"; micalg=pgp-md5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 09:34:30 -0400
Sender: rickc@lehman.com

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Aug__5_09:34:09_1997-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

    Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 16:30:36 +0200
    From: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
    
    Please don't bind anything to C-c <character>. These keybindings are
    reserved in the emacs for user bindings. No package should bind them.
    This binding will propably bother a lot of users.

Agreed.
    
    I think also that C-c is a mode specific prefix. Are these bindings
    local or global? I think they could be local in the emacs Lisp modes.
    
    May be better local bindings would be C-c C-f, C-c C-4 C-f and C-c C-5
    C-f.

C-4 and C-5 aren't going to make tty users happy.

			Rick


--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Aug__5_09:34:09_1997-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBM+cr0ltTztlqB385AQG2MQP/S1fYTBzZWLsb7jKdYcBy5q90qUZ4ZRK4
b9OfrHUXsbNBmejrJ5d8GdPXykpE83yZ+SlAIDqj95Tt45cYnvz5R7Bh6xc6Raib
LV4BRJCag5KiqYZeVfzAsSzk1GkE1ZoER+W/tTb8fKpYMd08HeKeDZiZxox0wx6+
Y2y7MWgvQhw=
=If49
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Aug__5_09:34:09_1997-1--

