From xemacs-m  Fri Jul 11 16:45:38 1997
Received: from newman.aventail.com (root@newman.aventail.com [199.238.236.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA24235
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:45:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer.in.aventail.com [192.168.1.12])
	by newman.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA21433;
	Fri, 11 Jul 1997 14:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wmperry@localhost)
	by kramer.in.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA31066;
	Fri, 11 Jul 1997 13:45:38 -0700
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.3-beta12 "Helsinki" is released
References: <m2en984tp2.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 	<kigiuyjettf.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 	<m2yb7fu7n2.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 	<kig67ujepvq.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 	<m2vi2ju4nh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <QQcxty10742.199707112031@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <kig4ta1tivc.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <86pvsp5o7c.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> <kigzprts2cd.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry)
Date: 11 Jul 1997 13:45:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "11 Jul 1997 23:31:14 +0200"
Message-ID: <86oh895nd9.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
Lines: 24
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/Emacs 19.34

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:
> 
> > > In fact, if I were to put the definition in my .emacs, I'd probably
> > > choose the exact values RMS put in there, i.e. disabling of minibuffer
> > > history errors, buffer-read-only, buffer-movement and such.
> > 
> > if you have debug-on-error set, you should get the errors.  Period.
> 
> You do get the errors.  The dubious thing is whether you want the
> debugger. :-)

  If you have debug-on-error set to non-nil, then _obviously_ you want the
debugger.  That's what that variable does.

> I mean, why is `debug-ignored-errors' such of annoyance to you all of a
> sudden?  It's been in GNU Emacs for more than a year (if not much more),
> and in XEmacs for some time, too.  Do you *really* need backtraces on
> these types of errors?  Why don't you set `debug-ignored-errors' to nil?

  Why should we have to? :)  Religious fire is beginning to crackle. :)

-Bill P.

