From xemacs-m  Wed Jul  9 18:13:06 1997
Received: from cerise.sensei.co.uk (glynn@muvies.demon.co.uk [158.152.66.14])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA21334
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 18:13:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from glynn@localhost) by cerise.sensei.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.2) id AAA00732; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:15:56 +0100
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:15:56 +0100
Message-Id: <199707092315.AAA00732@cerise.sensei.co.uk>
From: Glynn Clements <glynn@sensei.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Ebola messages
In-Reply-To: <kighge3eswt.fsf_-_@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <E0wm2Ug-0004oq-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
	<m2afjvvra0.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<kighge3eswt.fsf_-_@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 "Helsinki" XEmacs  Lucid (beta12)


Hrvoje Niksic wrote:

> Oh, and there is an annoying thing about Ebola for those of us who use 
> XEmacs on TTY-s from time to time -- the messages are shamelessly
> plunged to stderr, and it clutters the output -- like, completely.  Is 
> there a way to specify that they go someplace else?

Sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but what's wrong with:

	xemacs 2>~/.xemacs-errors

or replacing `xemacs' with a script which does the above?

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@sensei.co.uk>

