From xemacs-m  Mon Jul  7 21:19:45 1997
Received: from iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr [193.49.140.100])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA13850;
	Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:19:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from galibert@localhost) by iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id EAA23448; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 04:18:33 +0200
Message-ID: <19970708041833.58518@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 04:18:33 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: fix to unexelfsgi.c
References: <19970629170951.31459@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr> <199706291537.KAA03033@xemacs.org> <yljoh8f6uxi.fsf@halfway.dde.dk> <m2k9j2xq3z.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.78
In-Reply-To: <m2k9j2xq3z.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>; from Steven L Baur on Mon, Jul 07, 1997 at 06:57:36PM -0700

On Mon, Jul 07, 1997 at 06:57:36PM -0700, Steven L Baur wrote:
> Should I apply this patch?

Nope. I'm cleaning this mess. Besides, the patch was reversed,
the .got section is _not_ dumpted in unexelf.c (which makes
much more sense).

Besides, is anybody still using irix 4.* here ? And could
someone send me a temacs compiled with -g on irix 5.3 ?

  OG.

