From xemacs-m  Fri Jul  4 06:01:11 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA17361
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 06:01:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id NAA06576; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 13:01:10 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Solaris dynamics?
References: <199707031510.LAA08224@verve.canada.sun.com> 	<9707031753.AA04163@cfdevx1.lehman.com> <199707041011.DAA03398@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 04 Jul 1997 13:01:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of "Fri, 4 Jul 1997 03:11:25 -0700"
Message-ID: <kigvi2rjd3e.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta10) - "Athens"

Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:

> But just because something is useful to some customers doesn't mean
> it gets shipped.  Eventually the question "What about support?"
> raises its ugly head.  This is likely the reason why, for example,
> perl isn't shipped with Solaris.

The company could always wash its hands off the unsupported packages
(you know: distributed with NO WARRANTY blah blah...)

It's only a small matter of determination.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

