From xemacs-m  Thu Jul  3 02:07:37 1997
Received: from iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr [193.49.140.100])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA16276
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 02:07:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from galibert@localhost) by iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA13116; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 09:06:26 +0200
Message-ID: <19970703090625.60839@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 09:06:25 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: More on Ebola
References: <199707022247.SAA16133@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US> <m24tad2cod.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.78
In-Reply-To: <m24tad2cod.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>; from Steven L Baur on Wed, Jul 02, 1997 at 05:37:38PM -0700

On Wed, Jul 02, 1997 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Steven L Baur wrote:
> As has been pointed out, these functions actually work correctly
> (though not completely conveniently) with XEmacs 20.  If you change
> the boundary condition to be a character you will lose if there are
> zero bytes in the buffer.

Just a wondering: isn't it possible to have a character which is not
a possible character and assign it the meaning EOB ? Or would we need
mule for that ?

  OG.

