From xemacs-m  Wed Jul  2 03:47:46 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA20328
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 03:47:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) id BAA00859;
	Wed, 2 Jul 1997 01:51:01 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Success "Athens" on NEWSOS4
References: <28afk864yw.fsf_-_@ganews.ga.sony.co.jp> 	<m290zshav2.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <28soy0gtms.fsf@ganews.ga.sony.co.jp>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "30 Jun 1997 21:30:51 +0900"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 02 Jul 1997 01:51:01 -0700
Message-ID: <m2wwn9g7m2.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 28
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.61/XEmacs 20.3(beta11) - "Stockholm"

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@ga.sony.co.jp> writes:

sb> Is line length a problem only with your make?  If so, then the right
sb> change is to split up the command line.

sb> -${DUMPENV} ./temacs -batch -l ../prim/make-docfile.el -- \
sb> -o ${libsrc}DOC \
sb> -d ${srcdir} \
sb> -i ${libsrc}../site-packages \
sb> ${obj_src} \
sb> ${mallocdocsrc} \
sb> ${rallocdocsrc}

[Note that this is not a good replacement in general because
${mallocdocsrc} can be null, and that can confuse make as well :-(]

Martin, can we break up the obj_src variable in src/Makefile.in.in?

sb> Does this replacement work?

> Yes, it works. It makes ${libsrc}DOC completely. But `make' does not
> go to the next step, because call-process-internal() never returns.

Sigh.  Can you offer any hints as to why `call-process-internal'
doesn't work?
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

