From xemacs-m  Mon Jun 30 10:44:43 1997
Received: from firewall1.Lehman.COM (firewall.Lehman.COM [192.147.65.66])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA23769
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:44:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by firewall1.Lehman.COM (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA09382; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 11:44:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from unknown(146.127.39.20) by firewall1 via smap (V1.3)
	id tmp009345; Mon Jun 30 11:44:34 1997
Received: from cfdevx1.lehman.com by relay.lehman.com (4.1/LB-0.6)
	id AA19494; Mon, 30 Jun 97 11:44:32 EDT
Received: from localhost by cfdevx1.lehman.com (4.1/Lehman Bros. V1.6)
	id AA21861; Mon, 30 Jun 97 11:44:32 EDT
Message-Id: <9706301544.AA21861@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply-To: Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com>
X-Windows: The problem for your problem.
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
From: Rick Campbell <rickc@lehman.com>
To: acs@acm.org
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Solaris dynamics? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:51:26 EDT."
             <9706301451.AA21611@grind.icd.teradyne.com> 
X-Pgp-Version: 2.6.2
X-Pgp-Signed: iQCVAwUBM7fUVltTztlqB385AQGJjAP+MqWkV2v+OHVPf66XuM49jIdggjYqXp0g
	      waHxkIyF8zY6kFrKn4T31X3wLoxDAUqAbfKPU92WiCpn7sqPZob8cf5rPMxz50FI
	      7AwBXSsCnpJ2XnmVrBJyl4RGoQuf9OugXXkCFuTegT3wv+oQ3LTta54UVldIqZYZ
	      H57gT0RvW0k=
	      =H/z1
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 11:44:28 -0400
Sender: rickc@lehman.com

    Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:51:26 -0400
    From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>
    
    rickc@lehman.com said:
    > Anyway, when I try to run the prebuilt 19.15, I get an error message
    > about not being able to find libXm.so.3 and sure enough, what's in my
    > path is libXm.so.2.  Is there any way that I can run the prebuilt
    > XEmacs under Solaris? 
    
    What happens when you symlink libXm.so.3 to libXm.so.2?

Thanks.  This suggestion provided the solution.  Since I can't count
on the pathname being the same from one machine to the next, I just
decided that Solaris has to be handled like NT, i. e. I copied what
was missing to my local directory and adjusted things from there.

Maybe someone should remind Sun management that it's supposed to be
Microsoft playing the technology catch-up game with Sun, not Sun
trying to emulate Microsoft.  I suppose that the next step is for Sun
to stop supporting multiple users on the same box without a kernel
patch.  I'm sure glad that Microsoft finally got pre-emptive
multitasking or things could get really scary.

			Rick

