From xemacs-m  Sun Jun 29 04:48:08 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24994
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 1997 04:48:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) id CAA13655;
	Sun, 29 Jun 1997 02:51:00 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: core: xemacs-20.3-b8 -nw -q -no-site-file -l view-lossage.el
References: <rxsg1u1zt01.fsf@ecf.teradyne.com> 	<m2d8p5ojoo.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199706290937.CAA13225@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of "Sun, 29 Jun 1997 02:37:42 -0700"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 29 Jun 1997 02:50:59 -0700
Message-ID: <m23eq1ohz0.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 39
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta10) - "Athens"

Mail-Copies-To: never
Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:
> To: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>

Kyle, slrn is starting to use Mail-Copies-To:, why can't VM?  Please?
I'm *so* tired of well-meaning SPAM.

>>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:
sb> Adrian Aichner <aichner@ecf.teradyne.com> writes:
>>> Architecture: sun4m

>>> dbx: warning: undefined type number (90,63) at /usr/local/xemacs-20.3-b8/src/xemacs:emacs.c stab #603 s:p(90,63),
sb> ...
>>> [1] kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x5), at 0xef033e30

sb> Cool.  Why are Sun coredump listings so useless?  What can be done to
sb> improve this?

sb> Martin, will it help if the excrescence I commented out in emacs.c is
sb> reenabled by configure only for benighted Sun hosts?

> I added that code.  Why comment it out?  When does it cause grief?

You obviously don't read your crashes@xemacs.org mail.

> Isn't it only ever executed on Solaris anyhow?  I'd rather see more
> code like this added...

I don't, at least not this way.

> The stack printed by pstack prints the first 6 words of the arguments, 
> with argument order possibly rearranged by the compiler to confuse you.

> Martin


-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

