From xemacs-m  Fri Jun 27 18:35:12 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA05099
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 18:35:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcvus16541; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 19:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 19:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcvus16541.199706272335@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] `log-message-ignore-regexps': Message labeling
In-Reply-To: <kigk9ji8tmh.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <kigiuz3wmww.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<QQcvjv09752.199706250049@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<kigbu4uofrp.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<QQcvmj23648.199706251719@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<kigk9ji8tmh.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under 20.3 "Sofia" XEmacs  Lucid (beta9)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Hrvoje Niksic writes:
 > Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
 > 
 > >  > 1) how many functions will you log?  currently, only the "good" ones
 > >  >    are logged, which saves us from remembering a load of unnecessary
 > >  >    cruft;
 > 
 > > My suggestion is not meant to address a big problem, message
 > > classification.  Rather it was meant to address a little
 > > problem, applications being slowing down by regexp matching.
 > 
 > But the question in #1 still stands: how many messages do you propose
 > to log?

All of them.

 > > But if we're going to move to some message labelling system,
 > > we need to give it more thought than we've currently given
 > > it.
 > 
 > Why?  I cannot find a flaw in the way labeling is currently
 > implemented (Ben's implementation, I suppose).  Have I missed
 > something crucial on the way?

No, I'm just paranoid and off my medication again.

