(************************************************************************)
(*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team     *)
(* <O___,, *   INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2014     *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the       *)
(*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1        *)
(************************************************************************)

Require Import ZArith_base.
Require Import Zpow_def.
Require Import BinInt.
Require Import BinNat.
Require Import Setoid.
Require Import BinList.
Require Import BinPos.
Require Import BinNat.
Require Import BinInt.
Require Import Setoid.
Require Export Ncring.
Require Export Ncring_polynom.
Import List.

Set Implicit Arguments.

(* An object to return when an expression is not recognized as a constant *)
Definition NotConstant := false.

(** Z is a ring and a setoid*)

Lemma Zsth : Equivalence (@eq Z).
Proof. exact Z.eq_equiv. Qed.

Instance Zops:@Ring_ops Z 0%Z 1%Z Z.add Z.mul Z.sub Z.opp (@eq Z).

Instance Zr: (@Ring _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zops).
Proof.
constructor; try apply Zsth; try solve_proper.
 exact Z.add_comm. exact Z.add_assoc.
 exact Z.mul_1_l.  exact Z.mul_1_r. exact Z.mul_assoc.
 exact Z.mul_add_distr_r.  intros; apply Z.mul_add_distr_l.  exact Z.sub_diag.
Defined.

(*Instance ZEquality: @Equality Z:= (@eq Z).*)

(** Two generic morphisms from Z to (abrbitrary) rings, *)
(**second one is more convenient for proofs but they are ext. equal*)
Section ZMORPHISM.
Context {R:Type}`{Ring R}.

 Ltac rrefl := reflexivity.

 Fixpoint gen_phiPOS1 (p:positive) : R :=
  match p with
  | xH => 1
  | xO p => (1 + 1) * (gen_phiPOS1 p)
  | xI p => 1 + ((1 + 1) * (gen_phiPOS1 p))
  end.

 Fixpoint gen_phiPOS (p:positive) : R :=
  match p with
  | xH => 1
  | xO xH => (1 + 1)
  | xO p => (1 + 1) * (gen_phiPOS p)
  | xI xH => 1 + (1 +1)
  | xI p => 1 + ((1 + 1) * (gen_phiPOS p))
  end.

 Definition gen_phiZ1 z :=
  match z with
  | Zpos p => gen_phiPOS1 p
  | Z0 => 0
  | Zneg p => -(gen_phiPOS1 p)
  end.

 Definition gen_phiZ z :=
  match z with
  | Zpos p => gen_phiPOS p
  | Z0 => 0
  | Zneg p => -(gen_phiPOS p)
  end.
 Notation "[ x ]" := (gen_phiZ x).

 Definition get_signZ z :=
  match z with
  | Zneg p => Some (Zpos p)
  | _ => None
  end.

   Ltac norm := gen_rewrite.
   Ltac add_push :=  Ncring.gen_add_push.
Ltac rsimpl := simpl.

 Lemma same_gen : forall x, gen_phiPOS1 x == gen_phiPOS x.
 Proof.
  induction x;rsimpl.
  rewrite IHx. destruct x;simpl;norm.
  rewrite IHx;destruct x;simpl;norm.
  reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma ARgen_phiPOS_Psucc : forall x,
   gen_phiPOS1 (Pos.succ x) == 1 + (gen_phiPOS1 x).
 Proof.
  induction x;rsimpl;norm.
 rewrite IHx. gen_rewrite. add_push 1. reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma ARgen_phiPOS_add : forall x y,
   gen_phiPOS1 (x + y) == (gen_phiPOS1 x) + (gen_phiPOS1 y).
 Proof.
  induction x;destruct y;simpl;norm.
  rewrite Pos.add_carry_spec.
  rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_Psucc.
  rewrite IHx;norm.
  add_push (gen_phiPOS1 y);add_push 1;reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx;norm;add_push (gen_phiPOS1 y);reflexivity.
  rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_Psucc;norm;add_push 1;reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx;norm;add_push(gen_phiPOS1 y); add_push 1;reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx;norm;add_push(gen_phiPOS1 y);reflexivity.
  add_push 1;reflexivity.
  rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_Psucc;norm;add_push 1;reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma ARgen_phiPOS_mult :
   forall x y, gen_phiPOS1 (x * y) == gen_phiPOS1 x * gen_phiPOS1 y.
 Proof.
  induction x;intros;simpl;norm.
  rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_add;simpl;rewrite IHx;norm.
  rewrite IHx;reflexivity.
 Qed.


(*morphisms are extensionaly equal*)
 Lemma same_genZ : forall x, [x] == gen_phiZ1 x.
 Proof.
  destruct x;rsimpl; try rewrite same_gen; reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma gen_Zeqb_ok : forall x y,
   Zeq_bool x y = true -> [x] == [y].
 Proof.
  intros x y H7.
  assert (H10 := Zeq_bool_eq x y H7);unfold IDphi in H10.
  rewrite H10;reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma gen_phiZ1_add_pos_neg : forall x y,
 gen_phiZ1 (Z.pos_sub x y)
 == gen_phiPOS1 x + -gen_phiPOS1 y.
 Proof.
  intros x y.
  generalize (Z.pos_sub_discr x y).
  destruct (Z.pos_sub x y) as [|p|p]; intros; subst.
  - now rewrite ring_opp_def.
  - rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_add;simpl;norm.
    add_push (gen_phiPOS1 p). rewrite ring_opp_def;norm.
  - rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_add;simpl;norm.
    rewrite ring_opp_def;norm.
 Qed.

 Lemma match_compOpp : forall x (B:Type) (be bl bg:B),
  match CompOpp x with Eq => be | Lt => bl | Gt => bg end
  = match x with Eq => be | Lt => bg | Gt => bl end.
 Proof. destruct x;simpl;intros;trivial. Qed.

 Lemma gen_phiZ_add : forall x y, [x + y] == [x] + [y].
 Proof.
  intros x y; repeat rewrite same_genZ; generalize x y;clear x y.
  induction x;destruct y;simpl;norm.
  apply ARgen_phiPOS_add.
  apply gen_phiZ1_add_pos_neg. 
   rewrite gen_phiZ1_add_pos_neg. rewrite ring_add_comm.
reflexivity.
 rewrite ARgen_phiPOS_add. rewrite ring_opp_add. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma gen_phiZ_opp : forall x, [- x] == - [x].
 Proof.
  intros x. repeat rewrite same_genZ. generalize x ;clear x.
  induction x;simpl;norm.
  rewrite ring_opp_opp.  reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma gen_phiZ_mul : forall x y, [x * y] == [x] * [y].
 Proof.
  intros x y;repeat rewrite same_genZ.
  destruct x;destruct y;simpl;norm;
  rewrite  ARgen_phiPOS_mult;try (norm;fail).
  rewrite ring_opp_opp ;reflexivity.
 Qed.

 Lemma gen_phiZ_ext : forall x y : Z, x = y -> [x] == [y].
 Proof. intros;subst;reflexivity. Qed.

(*proof that [.] satisfies morphism specifications*)
Global Instance gen_phiZ_morph :
(@Ring_morphism (Z:Type) R _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zops Zr _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ gen_phiZ) . (* beurk!*)
 apply Build_Ring_morphism; simpl;try reflexivity.
   apply gen_phiZ_add. intros. rewrite ring_sub_def.
replace (x-y)%Z with (x + (-y))%Z.
now rewrite gen_phiZ_add, gen_phiZ_opp, ring_sub_def.
reflexivity.
 apply gen_phiZ_mul. apply gen_phiZ_opp. apply gen_phiZ_ext.
 Defined.

End ZMORPHISM.

Instance multiplication_phi_ring{R:Type}`{Ring R} : Multiplication  :=
  {multiplication x y := (gen_phiZ x) * y}.
