<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
       "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">
<Article>
 <ArticleInfo>
  <Title></Title>
  <Author></Author>
 </ArticleInfo>

<Sect1><Title><Anchor id="Testing.link.abbreviations"/>Testing link abbreviations</Title>

<Para>First paragraph. It does
not have anything weird.

</Para><Para><Anchor id="Second.paragraph"/>Second paragraph.  It doesn't have anything weird, either.  There's
just a line that begins with something that looks quite a lot like a
<Footnote><Para>linkdata</Para></Footnote> block.  Do we manage it?

</Para><Para>Okay, now for the <ULink url="mailto:some.email@address.fi">real</ULink> thing.  There should be all <ULink url="ftp://ftp.spoogle.com/">kinds of</ULink>
links here.  See <Quote><Link linkend="Testing.link.abbreviations">Testing link abbreviations</Link></Quote> to get a hold of what
they all <ULink url="http://www.meaning.org/">mean</ULink>.  <Footnote><Para>This is a longer footnote,
possibly spanning multiple lines.</Para></Footnote>.

</Para><Para>There are longer links: <URI>ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1355.txt</URI> and friends.  The problem with
<Link linkend="RFC2396">URIs</Link> is that you<Footnote><Para>the reader</Para></Footnote> have hard time knowing where they stop.
Take for example <URI>http://www.plt-scheme.org/</URI>: why is the slash included but
the colon not<Footnote><Para>Don't tell me that properly quoted URI's won't have colons in
such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
<Link linkend="RFC2396">RFC2396</Link>.</Para></Footnote>?  (Another example is
<URI>http://c2.com/cgi/quickChanges</URI>, or <URI>http://sange.fi/~atehwa/index.html</URI>&hellip;)

</Para><Para>Here is also an <InlineMediaObject>
<ImageObject><ImageData fileref="pictures/zebra.png"/></ImageObject>
<TextObject>inline image</TextObject>
</InlineMediaObject>.  Please jump <Link linkend="Second.paragraph">back</Link>.
I want you to consider an <ULink url="./foo.html">unadored relative link</ULink> and
<ULink url="../index.html">another</ULink>.

</Para><Para>Does the old-style footnote<Footnote><Para>such as this one here</Para></Footnote> work anymore in
the presence of link abbreviations<Footnote><Para>as tested by this file</Para></Footnote>?<Footnote><Para>And
does it work if broken into
multiple lines?</Para></Footnote>

</Para><Sect2><Title><Anchor id="w.autolabel.Explicit.label...is.not.guaranteed.to.work.properly."/><Anchor id="Explicit.label"/>Explicit label (is not guaranteed to work properly)</Title>

<Para>How do <Anchor id="multiple.labels"/>multiple labels in the same line <Anchor id="work"/>work?
What about <Anchor id="Second.label.conflicts"/>Second-label conflicts?

</Para><Para>&mdash; &mdash; &mdash;

</Para><Para>This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:

</Para><Para><Anchor id="RFC2396"/>RFC2396: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
(<URI>ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt</URI>)

</Para></Sect2></Sect1>
</Article>
