<rfc-editor-queue xmlns="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor-queue">
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-01-08</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8831</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, S. Loreto, M. Tuexen</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Data Channels
</title>
<bytes>36549</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-01-08</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8832</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, S. Loreto, M. Tuexen</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Data Channel Establishment Protocol
</title>
<bytes>28411</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-07-01</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8834</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Perkins, M. Westerlund, J. Ott</authors>
<title>
Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC): Media Transport and Use of RTP
</title>
<bytes>123242</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-11-23</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8855</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Camarillo, K. Drage, T. Kristensen, J. Ott, C. Eckel</authors>
<title>
The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
</title>
<bytes>225320</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-12-28</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8860</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Westerlund, C. Perkins, J. Lennox</authors>
<title>
Sending Multiple Types of Media in a Single RTP Session
</title>
<bytes>38919</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-framework-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-01-14</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8845</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-signaling</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Duckworth, Ed., A. Pepperell, S. Wenger</authors>
<title>
Framework for Telepresence Multi-Streams
</title>
<bytes>186803</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-03-09</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8861</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Lennox, M. Westerlund, Q. Wu, C. Perkins</authors>
<title>
Sending Multiple RTP Streams in a Single RTP Session: Grouping RTCP Reception Statistics and Other Feedback
</title>
<bytes>46256</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-05-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8833</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Thomson</authors>
<title>
Application Layer Protocol Negotiation for Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC) 
</title>
<bytes>15355</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-msid">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-msid-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-07-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8830</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
WebRTC MediaStream Identification in the Session Description Protocol
</title>
<bytes>35897</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-09</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8858</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
Indicating Exclusive Support of RTP/RTCP Multiplexing using SDP
</title>
<bytes>25385</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-15</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8846</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Presta, S. Pietro Romano</authors>
<title>
An XML Schema for the CLUE data model
</title>
<bytes>151635</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-08-22</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8837</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Jones, S. Dhesikan, C. Jennings, D. Druta</authors>
<title>
DSCP Packet Markings for WebRTC QoS
</title>
<bytes>26177</bytes>
<source>Transport Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-rid">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtext-rid-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-10-19</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8852</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A.B. Roach, S. Nandakumar, P. Thatcher</authors>
<title>
RTP Stream Identifier Source Description (SDES)
</title>
<bytes>19604</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-10-27</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8835</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
Transports for WebRTC
</title>
<bytes>41832</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-12-20</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8859</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Nandakumar</authors>
<title>
A Framework for Session Description Protocol (SDP) Attributes When Multiplexing
</title>
<bytes>234454</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-02-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8857</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>V. Pascual, A. Roman, S. Cazeaux, G. Salgueiro, R. Ravindranath</authors>
<title>
The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
</title>
<bytes>30505</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-02-27</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8849</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Even, J. Lennox</authors>
<title>
Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures
</title>
<bytes>32763</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-03-20</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8841</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, R. Shpount, S. Loreto, G. Camarillo</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Procedures For Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) over Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport.
</title>
<bytes>54708</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-lrr">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-07-07</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Lennox, D. Hong, J. Uberti, S. Holmer, M. Flodman</authors>
<title>
The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message
</title>
<bytes>31966</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-grasp">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-grasp-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-07-19</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Bormann, B. Carpenter, Ed., B. Liu, Ed.</authors>
<title>
A Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP)
</title>
<bytes>181149</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-10-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Xu, Ed., B. Decraene, Ed., R. Raszuk, L. Contreras, L. Jalil</authors>
<title>
The Tunnel Encapsulations OSPF Router Information
</title>
<bytes>22330</bytes>
<source>Open Shortest Path First IGP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-32.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-11-02</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8842</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, R. Shpount</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Considerations for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) and Transport Layer Security (TLS)
</title>
<bytes>58022</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-11-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8825</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Alvestrand</authors>
<title>
Overview: Real Time Protocols for Browser-based Applications
</title>
<bytes>53526</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-01</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8829</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-msid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Uberti, C. Jennings, E. Rescorla, Ed.</authors>
<title>
JavaScript Session Establishment Protocol
</title>
<bytes>256248</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-05</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., S. Sathappan, W. Henderickx, A. Sajassi, J. Drake</authors>
<title>
Interconnect Solution for EVPN Overlay networks
</title>
<bytes>67427</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support">
<draft>draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Eastlake 3rd, B. Briscoe</authors>
<title>
TRILL (TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links): ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) Support
</title>
<bytes>33826</bytes>
<source>Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-03-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-keystore</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Wildes, Ed., K. Koushik, Ed.</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration
</title>
<bytes>65515</bytes>
<source>Network Modeling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-rid">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-16</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8851</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A.B. Roach, Ed.</authors>
<title>
RTP Payload Format Restrictions
</title>
<bytes>61967</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-yang-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Liu, P. McAllister, A. Peter, M. Sivakumar, Y. Liu, F. Hu</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)
</title>
<bytes>206487</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ice-trickle">
<draft>draft-ietf-ice-trickle-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-22</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8838</auth48-url>
<authors>E. Ivov, J. Uberti, P. Saint-Andre</authors>
<title>
Trickle ICE: Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Protocol
</title>
<bytes>74390</bytes>
<source>Interactive Connectivity Establishment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-05-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., W. Henderickx, J. Drake, W. Lin, A. Sajassi</authors>
<title>
IP Prefix Advertisement in EVPN
</title>
<bytes>83101</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-54.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-06-18</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8843</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, H. Alvestrand, C. Jennings</authors>
<title>
Negotiating Media Multiplexing Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
</title>
<bytes>147171</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-02</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8840</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Ivov, T. Stach, E. Marocco, C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Usage for Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (Trickle ICE)
</title>
<bytes>101829</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8853</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rid</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Burman, M. Westerlund, S. Nandakumar, M. Zanaty</authors>
<title>
Using Simulcast in SDP and RTP Sessions
</title>
<bytes>94865</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-07-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8913</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Civil, A. Morton, R. Rahman, M. Jethanandani, K. Pentikousis, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Data Model
</title>
<bytes>136989</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-yang-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-08-06</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Rahman, Ed., L. Zheng, Ed., M. Jethanandani, Ed., S. Pallagatti, G. Mirsky</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
</title>
<bytes>145281</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile">
<draft>draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-09-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-source-specific</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Chroboczek</authors>
<title>
Homenet profile of the Babel routing protocol
</title>
<bytes>19874</bytes>
<source>Home Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-12-21</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8856</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Camarillo, T. Kristensen, C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams
</title>
<bytes>48918</bytes>
<source>Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-03.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-01-28</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Boucadair, C. Jacquenet</authors>
<title>
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message &amp; IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
</title>
<bytes>10277</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, C. Filsfils, K. Patel, S. Ray, J. Dong</authors>
<title>
BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering
</title>
<bytes>38137</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-28.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-21</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8864</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Drage, M. Makaraju, R. Ejzak, J. Marcon, R. Even, Ed.</authors>
<title>
SDP-based Data Channel Negotiation
</title>
<bytes>91932</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-06-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8871</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Jones, D. Benham, C. Groves</authors>
<title>
A Solution Framework for Private Media in Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing (PERC)
</title>
<bytes>68797</bytes>
<source>Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-04</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, M. Chen</authors>
<title>
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
</title>
<bytes>70095</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao">
<draft>draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-11</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jadhav, Ed., P. Thubert, R. Sahoo, Z. Cao</authors>
<title>
Efficient Route Invalidation
</title>
<bytes>55789</bytes>
<source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8828</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Uberti</authors>
<title>
WebRTC IP Address Handling Requirements
</title>
<bytes>26488</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-security">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8826</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
Security Considerations for WebRTC
</title>
<bytes>65610</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-16</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8854</auth48-url>
<authors>J. Uberti</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Forward Error Correction Requirements
</title>
<bytes>27189</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch">
<draft>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-07-22</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8827</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
WebRTC Security Architecture
</title>
<bytes>102483</bytes>
<source>Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8844</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Thomson, E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
Unknown Key Share Attacks on uses of TLS with the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
</title>
<bytes>47406</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-39.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-14</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8839</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Petit-Huguenin, S. Nandakumar, C. Holmberg, A. Keränen, R. Shpount</authors>
<title>
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)
</title>
<bytes>94766</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-37.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-20</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8866</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Begen, P. Kyzivat, C. Perkins, M. Handley</authors>
<title>
SDP: Session Description Protocol
</title>
<bytes>133368</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-yang-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-08-26</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Yeung, Y. Qu, Z. Zhang, I. Chen, A. Lindem</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol
</title>
<bytes>234221</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time">
<draft>draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>L. Thomas, S. Anamalamudi, S. Anand, M. Hegde, C. Perkins</authors>
<title>
Packet Delivery Deadline time in 6LoWPAN Routing Header
</title>
<bytes>47643</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg">
<draft>draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-42.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-17</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Litkowski, D. Yeung, A. Lindem, J. Zhang, L. Lhotka</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol
</title>
<bytes>211538</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security">
<draft>draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-11</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-stateless</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Vucinic, Ed., J. Simon, K. Pister, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
Constrained Join Protocol (CoJP) for 6TiSCH
</title>
<bytes>132046</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-23</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8879</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Ghedini, V. Vasiliev</authors>
<title>
TLS Certificate Compression
</title>
<bytes>17410</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ace-coap-est">
<draft>draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-01-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-dtls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. van der Stok, P. Kampanakis, M. Richardson, S. Raza</authors>
<title>
EST over secure CoAP (EST-coaps)
</title>
<bytes>109546</bytes>
<source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8912</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Morton, M. Bagnulo, P. Eardley, K. D'Souza</authors>
<title>
Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries
</title>
<bytes>156719</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags">
<draft>draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8819</auth48-url>
<authors>C. Hopps, L. Berger, D. Bogdanovic</authors>
<title>
YANG Module Tags
</title>
<bytes>37221</bytes>
<source>Network Modeling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon">
<draft>draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-18</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(3G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Dujovne, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element encapsulation of 6TiSCH Join and Enrollment Information
</title>
<bytes>27832</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Raza, Ed., R. Asati, X. Liu, S. Esale, X. Chen, H. Shah</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Model for MPLS LDP
</title>
<bytes>176852</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email">
<draft>draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-24</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>L. Velvindron, S. Farrell</authors>
<title>
Deprecation of use of TLS 1.1 for Email Submission and Access
</title>
<bytes>10383</bytes>
<source>Using TLS in Applications</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-04-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T.T.E. Eckert, M.H. Behringer, K.W. Watsen</authors>
<title>
Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)
</title>
<bytes>300799</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-04-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8865</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, G. Hellstrom</authors>
<title>
T.140 Real-time Text Conversation over WebRTC Data Channels
</title>
<bytes>46048</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ice-pac">
<draft>draft-ietf-ice-pac-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-04-27</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8863</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ice-trickle</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg, J. Uberti</authors>
<title>
Interactive Connectivity Establishment Patiently Awaiting Connectivity (ICE PAC)
</title>
<bytes>16203</bytes>
<source>Interactive Connectivity Establishment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-05-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Loibl, S. Hares, R. Raszuk, D. McPherson, M. Bacher</authors>
<title>
Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules
</title>
<bytes>90137</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc">
<draft>draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-01</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Xu, S. Kini, P. Psenak, C. Filsfils, S. Litkowski, M. Bocci</authors>
<title>
Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS
</title>
<bytes>15882</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc">
<draft>draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-01</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>X. Xu, S. Kini, P. Psenak, C. Filsfils, S. Litkowski, M. Bocci</authors>
<title>
Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using OSPF
</title>
<bytes>18504</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet">
<draft>draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-23</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8870</auth48-url>
<authors>C. Jennings, J. Mattsson, D. McGrew, D. Wing, F. Andreasen</authors>
<title>
Encrypted Key Transport for DTLS and Secure RTP
</title>
<bytes>57495</bytes>
<source>Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-secevent-http-push">
<draft>draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-29</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8935</auth48-url>
<authors>A. Backman, Ed., M. Jones, Ed., M. Scurtescu, M. Ansari, A. Nadalin</authors>
<title>
Push-Based Security Event Token (SET) Delivery Using HTTP
</title>
<bytes>50322</bytes>
<source>Security Events</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll">
<draft>draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-29</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8936</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-secevent-http-push</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Backman, Ed., M. Jones, Ed., M. Scurtescu, M. Ansari, A. Nadalin</authors>
<title>
Poll-Based Security Event Token (SET) Delivery Using HTTP
</title>
<bytes>43756</bytes>
<source>Security Events</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control">
<draft>draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-29</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Nishizuka, M. Boucadair, T. Reddy, T. Nagata</authors>
<title>
Controlling Filtering Rules Using Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel
</title>
<bytes>50010</bytes>
<source>DDoS Open Threat Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8941</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Nottingham, P. Kamp</authors>
<title>
Structured Field Values for HTTP
</title>
<bytes>78342</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8945</auth48-url>
<authors>F. Dupont, S. Morris, P. Vixie, D. Eastlake 3rd, O. Gudmundsson, B. Wellington</authors>
<title>
Secret Key Transaction Authentication for DNS (TSIG)
</title>
<bytes>66569</bytes>
<source>Domain Name System Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-detnet-ip">
<draft>draft-ietf-detnet-ip-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8939</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Varga, Ed., J. Farkas, L. Berger, D. Fedyk, S. Bryant</authors>
<title>
DetNet Data Plane: IP
</title>
<bytes>57921</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert">
<draft>draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-24</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8946</auth48-url>
<authors>J. Peterson</authors>
<title>
PASSporT Extension for Diverted Calls
</title>
<bytes>49925</bytes>
<source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-gpe">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-11</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>F. Maino, Ed., J. Lemon, P. Agarwal, D. Lewis, M. Smith</authors>
<title>
LISP Generic Protocol Extension
</title>
<bytes>36206</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel">
<draft>draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-24.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8873</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>JM. Recio, Ed., C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
MSRP over Data Channels
</title>
<bytes>59893</bytes>
<source>Multiparty Multimedia Session Control</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-route">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-route-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Alvarez-Hamelin, A. Morton, J. Fabini, C. Pignataro, R. Geib</authors>
<title>
Advanced Unidirectional Route Assessment (AURA)
</title>
<bytes>64546</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-30.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-21</date-received>
<state>IESG*A</state>
<authors>N. Sakimura, J. Bradley, M. Jones</authors>
<title>
The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR)
</title>
<bytes>72482</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-25</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Zhao, X. Liu, Y. Liu, M. Sivakumar, A. Peter</authors>
<title>
A Yang Data Model for IGMP and MLD Snooping
</title>
<bytes>82199</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-27</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Farrel, J. Drake, E. Rosen, J. Uttaro, L. Jalil</authors>
<title>
BGP Control Plane for the Network Service Header in Service Function Chaining
</title>
<bytes>166204</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled Services</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-babel-dtls">
<draft>draft-ietf-babel-dtls-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-03</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8968</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Décimo, D. Schinazi, J. Chroboczek</authors>
<title>
Babel Routing Protocol over Datagram Transport Layer Security
</title>
<bytes>23203</bytes>
<source>Babel routing protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-03</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8966</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-hmac</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Chroboczek, D. Schinazi</authors>
<title>
The Babel Routing Protocol
</title>
<bytes>161068</bytes>
<source>Babel routing protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign">
<draft>draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-04</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8947</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Volz, T. Mrugalski, C. Bernardos</authors>
<title>
Link-Layer Addresses Assignment Mechanism for DHCPv6
</title>
<bytes>48378</bytes>
<source>Dynamic Host Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-babel-hmac">
<draft>draft-ietf-babel-hmac-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-08</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8967</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Do, W. Kolodziejak, J. Chroboczek</authors>
<title>
MAC authentication for the Babel routing protocol
</title>
<bytes>49752</bytes>
<source>Babel routing protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6tisch-msf">
<draft>draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-14</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Chang, Ed., M. Vucinic, X. Vilajosana, S. Duquennoy, D. Dujovne</authors>
<title>
6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF)
</title>
<bytes>51386</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-30</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8949</auth48-url>
<authors>C. Bormann, P. Hoffman</authors>
<title>
Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
</title>
<bytes>198332</bytes>
<source>Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant">
<draft>draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8948</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>CJ. Bernardos, A. Mourad</authors>
<title>
SLAP quadrant selection option for DHCPv6
</title>
<bytes>44893</bytes>
<source>Dynamic Host Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-26</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8960</auth48-url>
<authors>T. Saad, K. Raza, R. Gandhi, X. Liu, V. Beeram</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base
</title>
<bytes>52010</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-detnet-mpls">
<draft>draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-27</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Varga, Ed., J. Farkas, L. Berger, A. Malis, S. Bryant, J. Korhonen</authors>
<title>
DetNet Data Plane: MPLS
</title>
<bytes>76435</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls">
<draft>draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-27</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-ip</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-detnet-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Varga, Ed., L. Berger, D. Fedyk, S. Bryant, J. Korhonen</authors>
<title>
DetNet Data Plane: IP over MPLS
</title>
<bytes>27523</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-28</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8957</auth48-url>
<authors>S. Bryant, M. Chen, G. Swallow, S. Sivabalan, G. Mirsky</authors>
<title>
Synonymous Flow Label Framework
</title>
<bytes>22797</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-30.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Eckert, Ed., M. Behringer, Ed., S. Bjarnason</authors>
<title>
An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)
</title>
<bytes>461005</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-02</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Dhody, A. Farrel, Z. Li</authors>
<title>
PCEP Extension for Flow Specification
</title>
<bytes>81648</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls">
<draft>draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-03</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-dtls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Myklebust, C. Lever, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Towards Remote Procedure Call Encryption By Default
</title>
<bytes>60923</bytes>
<source>Network File System Version 4</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>G. Mirsky, X. Min, H. Nydell, R. Foote, A. Masputra, E. Ruffini</authors>
<title>
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions
</title>
<bytes>77415</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery">
<draft>draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Boucadair, T. Reddy.K</authors>
<title>
Distributed-Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Agent Discovery
</title>
<bytes>57831</bytes>
<source>DDoS Open Threat Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview">
<draft>draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>M. Slusarz</authors>
<title>
IMAP4 Extension: Message Preview Generation
</title>
<bytes>26963</bytes>
<source>Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Z. Sarker, C. Perkins, V. Singh, M. Ramalho</authors>
<title>
RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Feedback for Congestion Control
</title>
<bytes>39795</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Wessels, P. Barber, M. Weinberg, W. Kumari, W. Hardaker</authors>
<title>
Message Digest for DNS Zones
</title>
<bytes>84724</bytes>
<source>Domain Name System Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-stateless">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-stateless-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>K. Hartke, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
Extended Tokens and Stateless Clients in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
</title>
<bytes>51598</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar">
<draft>draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-32.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>N. Jenkins, R. Stepanek</authors>
<title>
JSCalendar: A JSON representation of calendar data
</title>
<bytes>182752</bytes>
<source>Calendaring Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-25</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Loibl, Ed., R. Raszuk, Ed., S. Hares, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6
</title>
<bytes>37518</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2014-12-12</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8836</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Jesup, Z. Sarker, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Congestion Control Requirements for Interactive Real-Time Media
</title>
<bytes>27484</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-introduction">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2015-04-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-sec</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Cabellos-Aparicio, D. Saucez, Ed.</authors>
<title>
An Architectural Introduction to the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
</title>
<bytes>66992</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lwig-cellular">
<draft>draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2016-01-04</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-resource-directory</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Arkko, A. Eriksson, A. Keränen</authors>
<title>
Building Power-Efficient CoAP Devices for Cellular Networks
</title>
<bytes>39751</bytes>
<source>Light-Weight Implementation Guidance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-12-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Jiang, Ed., Z. Du, B. Carpenter, Q. Sun</authors>
<title>
Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-scale Networks
</title>
<bytes>52556</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2017-12-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(3G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, G. Dawra, Ed., E. Aries, D. Afanasiev</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Engineering
</title>
<bytes>35539</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-reference-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-11-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-grasp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Behringer, Ed., B. Carpenter, T. Eckert, L. Ciavaglia, J. Nobre</authors>
<title>
A Reference Model for Autonomic Networking
</title>
<bytes>72222</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-12-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Stark</authors>
<title>
Expect-CT Extension for HTTP
</title>
<bytes>51380</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-03-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-hip-dex</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Moskowitz, Ed., M. Komu</authors>
<title>
Host Identity Protocol Architecture
</title>
<bytes>133290</bytes>
<source>Host Identity Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-datachannel">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-04-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8850</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Holmberg</authors>
<title>
CLUE Protocol data channel
</title>
<bytes>29058</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec">
<draft>draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-14</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8862</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Peterson, R. Barnes, R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Best Practices for Securing RTP Media Signaled with SIP
</title>
<bytes>35321</bytes>
<source>SIP Best-practice Recommendations Against Network Dangers to privacY</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-05-30</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8867</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Z. Sarker, V. Singh, X. Zhu, M. Ramalho</authors>
<title>
Test Cases for Evaluating RMCAT Proposals
</title>
<bytes>68718</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture">
<draft>draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-10-30</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6tisch-msf</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Thubert</authors>
<title>
An Architecture for IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4
</title>
<bytes>177561</bytes>
<source>IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-signaling">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-signaling-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8848</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Hanton, P. Kyzivat, L. Xiao, C. Groves</authors>
<title>
Session Signaling for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
</title>
<bytes>98889</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-clue-protocol">
<draft>draft-ietf-clue-protocol-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8847</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-datachannel</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-framework</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-clue-signaling</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Presta, S P. Romano</authors>
<title>
Protocol for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
</title>
<bytes>146848</bytes>
<source>ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Jeong, S. Hyun, T. Ahn, S. Hares, D. Lopez</authors>
<title>
Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security Functions to Network-Based Security Services
</title>
<bytes>69045</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-stir-oob">
<draft>draft-ietf-stir-oob-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8816</auth48-url>
<authors>E. Rescorla, J. Peterson</authors>
<title>
STIR Out-of-Band Architecture and Use Cases
</title>
<bytes>74592</bytes>
<source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-24.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8911</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Bagnulo, B. Claise, P. Eardley, A. Morton, A. Akhter</authors>
<title>
Registry for Performance Metrics
</title>
<bytes>86075</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8869</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Z. Sarker, X. Zhu, J. Fu</authors>
<title>
Evaluation Test Cases for Interactive Real-Time Media over Wireless Networks
</title>
<bytes>50652</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria">
<draft>draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-03-25</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8868</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>V. Singh, J. Ott, S. Holmer</authors>
<title>
Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive Real-time Media
</title>
<bytes>37167</bytes>
<source>RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8938</auth48-url>
<authors>B. Varga, Ed., J. Farkas, L. Berger, A. Malis, S. Bryant</authors>
<title>
DetNet Data Plane Framework
</title>
<bytes>63399</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-06-22</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8872</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Westerlund, B. Burman, C. Perkins, H. Alvestrand, R. Even</authors>
<title>
Guidelines for using the Multiplexing Features of RTP to Support Multiple Media Streams
</title>
<bytes>108104</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8942</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>I. Grigorik, Y. Weiss</authors>
<title>
HTTP Client Hints
</title>
<bytes>29771</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dots-use-cases">
<draft>draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8903</auth48-url>
<authors>R. Dobbins, D. Migault, R. Moskowitz, N. Teague, L. Xia, K. Nishizuka</authors>
<title>
Use cases for DDoS Open Threat Signaling
</title>
<bytes>33941</bytes>
<source>DDoS Open Threat Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs">
<draft>draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-07-30</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Schaad</authors>
<title>
CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Initial Algorithms
</title>
<bytes>130126</bytes>
<source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal">
<draft>draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-33.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-08-04</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Keränen, J. Melen, M. Komu, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Native NAT Traversal Mode for the Host Identity Protocol
</title>
<bytes>179965</bytes>
<source>Host Identity Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-babel-applicability">
<draft>draft-ietf-babel-applicability-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-03</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8965</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Chroboczek</authors>
<title>
Applicability of the Babel routing protocol
</title>
<bytes>24454</bytes>
<source>Babel routing protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs">
<draft>draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-14</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Schaad</authors>
<title>
CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Hash Algorithms
</title>
<bytes>26902</bytes>
<source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-capport-architecture">
<draft>draft-ietf-capport-architecture-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-09-24</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8952</auth48-url>
<authors>K. Larose, D. Dolson, H. Liu</authors>
<title>
Captive Portal Architecture
</title>
<bytes>52983</bytes>
<source>Captive Portal Interaction</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-26</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>Q. Wu, Ed., M. Boucadair, Ed., D. Lopez, C. Xie, L. Geng</authors>
<title>
A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG
</title>
<bytes>107250</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-29</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>S. Pallagatti, Ed., G. Mirsky, Ed., S. Paragiri, V. Govindan, M. Mudigonda</authors>
<title>
BFD for VXLAN
</title>
<bytes>21613</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
<entry xml:id="draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis">
<draft>draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-04-23</date-received>
<state>IESG</state>
<authors>Y. Collet, M. Kucherawy, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Zstandard Compression and the application/zstd Media Type
</title>
<bytes>110649</bytes>
<source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update">
<draft>draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-15</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8958</auth48-url>
<authors>T. Hardie</authors>
<title>
Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA
</title>
<bytes>6002</bytes>
<source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo">
<draft>draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-02.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-21</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8959</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Nottingham</authors>
<title>
The secret-token URI Scheme
</title>
<bytes>10817</bytes>
<source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IAB STREAM">
</section>
<section name="IRTF STREAM">
</section>
<section name="INDEPENDENT SUBMISSIONS">
<entry xml:id="draft-ribose-asciirfc">
<draft>draft-ribose-asciirfc-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2018-04-19</date-received>
<state>AUTH</state>
<authors>R. Tse, N. Nicholas, J. Lau, P. Brasolin</authors>
<title>
draft-ribose-asciirfc-08
</title>
<bytes>287041</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-moriarty-caris2">
<draft>draft-moriarty-caris2-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-10-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8953</auth48-url>
<authors>K. Moriarty</authors>
<title>
Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale 2 (CARIS2) Workshop Report
</title>
<bytes>37116</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project">
<draft>draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2020-11-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Huitema</authors>
<title>
Evaluation of a Sample of RFC Produced in 2018
</title>
<bytes>113945</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
</rfc-editor-queue>
